From 09c910bc850dda39858a2af317d6b3f03fb473ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Pietrzak Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 14:57:27 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] typo --- tex/1-introduction.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tex/1-introduction.tex b/tex/1-introduction.tex index c906011..b385f4f 100644 --- a/tex/1-introduction.tex +++ b/tex/1-introduction.tex @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ To this day we still talk about that each time we have the chance to meet. His point referred to Gibson's work on perception, especially his paper on active touch~\cite{gibson62}. In this paper, Gibson describes an experiment in which participants had to recognize the shape of cookie cutters with their sense of touch only. There were two conditions: half of the participants could only feel the cookie-cutter pressed on their hand, the other half could explore the contours with their fingers. -It turned out that participants of the first condition recognized $29\%$ of the shapes, and participants of the other condition $95\%$ of the shapes. +It turned out that participants of the first condition recognized $29\%$ of the shapes, and participants of the other condition $95\%$ of the shapes. This experiment clearly shows that our exploration actions are as important as our sensations in our understanding of our environment. In my work, I made a consensual distinction between tactile and force feedback. I called tactile feedback sensations coming from the mechanoreceptors in the skin, and force feedback sensations coming from muscles, tendons, and joints~\cite{oakley00}. -- 2.30.2