Figure amplifiers

diff --git a/figures/actuatorcircuit.tex b/figures/actuatorcircuit.tex
index 50ecc6aeb11c72501ef537dc431e0dd22376a865..2d1fa1e709ccdd40efe4331452c5bcf12fed1d4a 100644 (file)
--- a/figures/actuatorcircuit.tex
+++ b/figures/actuatorcircuit.tex
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
   
   \tikzexternalenable
   \begin{circuitikz}[]
-    \ctikzset{diodes/scale=0.6}
+    \ctikzset{diodes/scale=0.6, mylength/.style={bipoles/length=#1}}%, elmech/scale=0.6}
     \draw (0,0) node[and port] (andgate) {}
       (andgate.in 1) to[short, -o] ++(-0.5,0) node[anchor=east, cellblue] {Frequency}
       (andgate.in 2) to[short, -o] ++(-0.5,0) node[anchor=east, cellred] {Amplitude}
@@ -35,7 +35,8 @@
 
     \draw (nmos.S) node[tlground](GND){};
 
-    \draw (nmos.D) to[short] ++(-0.5,0) to[short] ++(0,0.25) to[L, l=\textbf{Actuator}] ++(0,1) to[short] ++(0,0.25) to[short, -*] ++(0.5,0) node[vcc](vcc){3V3};
+    %\draw (nmos.D) to[short] ++(-0.5,0) to[short] ++(0,0.25) to[L, l=\textbf{Actuator}] ++(0,1) to[short] ++(0,0.25) to[short, -*] ++(0.5,0) node[vcc](vcc){3V3};
+    \draw (nmos.D) to[short] ++(-0.5,0) to[short] ++(0,0.25) to[Telmech=A,n=actuator, mylength=10mm] ++(0,1) to[short] ++(0,0.25) to[short, -*] ++(0.5,0) node[vcc](vcc){3V3};
 
     \draw (nmos.D) -- ++(0.5,0) to[short] ++(0,0.25) to[D] ++(0,1) to[short] ++(0,0.25) to[short] ++(-0.5,0);
   \end{circuitikz}%

diff --git a/figures/amplifiers.tex b/figures/amplifiers.tex
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..f1f7922
--- /dev/null
+++ b/figures/amplifiers.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+%!TEX root = ../hdrmain.tex
+
+\begin{figure}[htb]
+  \centering
+
+  \definecolor{cellred}{rgb}    {0.98,0.17,0.15}
+  \definecolor{cellblue}{rgb}    {0.17,0.60,0.99}
+
+  \tikzexternalenable
+  %\begin{circuitikz}[scale=0.8, transform shape]
+  \begin{circuitikz}[]
+    \ctikzset{amplifiers/fill=cellblue, resistors/scale=0.5, component text=left}
+    \draw (0,0) node[above]{$v_i$} to[short, o-] ++(0.5,0)
+      node[op amp, noinv input up, anchor=+, scale=0.7](OA){}
+      (OA.-) -- ++(0,-0.8) coordinate(outnode)
+      to[R=$R_1$] ++(0,-1.0) node[tlground]{}
+      (outnode) to[R=$R_2$, *-] (outnode -| OA.out) -- (OA.out)
+      to [short, *-o] ++(1,0) node[above]{$v_o$}
+    ;
+
+    \draw (7,0) node[above]{$v_i$} to[short,o-] ++(0.5,0) 
+      to[R=$R_1$] ++(1.5,0) coordinate(outnode2)
+      to[R=$R_2$] ++(2.0,0) -- ++(0,-1.0)
+      node[op amp, anchor=out, scale=0.7](OB){} to [short, *-o] ++(1,0) node[above]{$v_o$}
+      (OB.+) -- ++(0,-0.5) node[ground]{}
+      (OB.-) -- (OB.- -| outnode2) to[short, -*] (outnode2)
+    ;
+  \end{circuitikz}%
+  \tikzexternaldisable
+  \caption[Non-inverting amplifier and inverting amplifier.]{Non-inverting amplifier and inverting amplifier. They both use their inputs and their own output to compute their output.}
+  \label{fig:actuatorcircuit}
+\end{figure}

diff --git a/tex/4-loop.tex b/tex/4-loop.tex
index 25c4d88377b498044e4aa42ca7c01e16497023ea..150f10db64cdc93a2b3df349c9b559f598c7e2b9 100644 (file)
--- a/tex/4-loop.tex
+++ b/tex/4-loop.tex
@@ -491,6 +491,12 @@ However, functions such as in this example make sense.
 We observe here that each iteration of the co-fixpoint can be inductive, as it is the case in the example.
 It shows that interaction is a general process that connects entities in the environment to enable them exchanging information.
 Algorithms only process information to transform input into outputs without knowledge of the overall scheme.
+
+\input{figures/amplifiers.tex}
+
+
+
+
 \todo{Maybe move stuff below to the discussion…}
 Wegner describe several kinds of what he calls \defwords{interaction machines}{interaction machine}.
 He gives the a machine that simply echoes an input stream to an output stream~\cite{wegner97} to demonstrate the power of the interaction phenomenon.
@@ -499,9 +505,10 @@ It can win half of chess games between these two people.
 When I discussed this with \fixme{Gérard Berry}, he said this was cheating.
 \todo{Should I remove the name?}
 But it is no different from AlphaZero which processes human knowledge to beat chess world champions~\cite{silver18}.
-Further, Algorithms are immutable human behavior and knowledge.
-%In fact in this latter case we often cite it as a superiority of machines.
 When the machine wins the game the reward is for the machine designer not for the machine.
+%In fact in this latter case we often cite it as a superiority of machines.
+Further, machines are crystallized human knowledge and behavior at a given time.
+They process data and perform operations with this knowledge and behavior state until humans update them to a newer knowledge and behavior state.
 
 
 % \begin{algorithm}[htb]