few remarks

diff --git a/tex/introduction.tex b/tex/introduction.tex
index 66069e3a04fefc56dcb4dec78d16b6df89085c9f..de46c4e2381533db067fe1c78555d3a0126c0f2d 100644 (file)
--- a/tex/introduction.tex
+++ b/tex/introduction.tex
@@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ He exposed three fascinating visions:
 
 \subsection{Englebart}
 
-Englebart's vision stems from Vannevar Bush's work on the Memex.% as he was coordinating scientific research in the United States during the second world war.
-The Memex was the idea of extending human memory with an electronic library~\cite{bush45}.
+Englebart's vision stems from Vannevar Bush's work on the Memex, % as he was coordinating scientific research in the United States during the second world war.
+the idea of extending human memory with an electronic library~\cite{bush45}.
 It comprises a mechanism to store books and notes, an indexing system that allows searching documents, and a way to bookmark documents.
 Hypertext, computer networks and search engines are directly inspired by this vision.
 Between 1962 and 1968, at a time computer were a room size, Englebart pushed this vision forward.
@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ In his famous 1968 demo\footnote{The mother of all demos: \url{https://youtu.be/
 It was not only mesmerizing because it was a huge list of striking ideas, but also because it was actually functioning live, contrary to the Memex which remained a concept.
 The reason why it was not only a technology push forward, but the creation of a whole new scientific area is that computers were not anymore just computing machines, but interactive machines that help us in our everyday tasks.
 This vision changed the way we work, our entertainments, and any other of our activities which uses an interactive system at some point.
+Along with Sutherland's work on Sketchpad~\cite{sutherland63}, and of course Bush's Memex that inspired them, these are the foundations of Human-Computer Interaction.
 
 \subsection{Wegner}
 
@@ -151,13 +152,15 @@ It is only limited by what it observes, and how this observation is encoded.
 \subsection{Beaudouin-Lafon}
 
 
-Beaudouin-Lafon defined the Instrumented interaction paradigm~\cite{mbl00}, which extends Schneiderman's direct manipulation©\cite{schneiderman83}. Instruments are tools that enables users to interact with domain objects. To do so, the user performs actions on the instrument, which provide the user an immediate feedback, and perform a command on the domain object. As a consequence, the domain object returns a response to the user. The immediate feedback provides high level of control thanks to a fast perception/action cycle. The response to the command lets the user know the result of his actions, and allows him to continue or correct errors where necessary.
+Beaudouin-Lafon defined the Instrumented interaction paradigm~\cite{mbl00}, which extends Schneiderman's direct manipulation~\cite{schneiderman83}. Instruments are tools that enables users to interact with domain objects. To do so, the user performs actions on the instrument, which provide the user an immediate feedback, and perform a command on the domain object. As a consequence, the domain object returns a response to the user. The immediate feedback provides high level of control thanks to a fast perception/action cycle. The response to the command lets the user know the result of his actions, and allows him to continue or correct errors where necessary.
 
 Beyond instrumented interaction, Beaudouin-Lafon describes three interaction paradigms: \emph{computer-as-a-tool}, \emph{computer-as-a-partner} and \emph{computer-as-a-medium}~\cite{mbl04}.
 
 
 Reification polymorphism reuse \cite{mbl00a}
 
+\cite{mbl06}
+
 \section{My stuff}
 
 The idea of computers replacing humans for every task is futile.
@@ -219,9 +222,14 @@ Rigid systems perform long calculations with rare notifications, therefore rare
 \end{figure}
 
 Discussion on initiative?
+Mixed-Initiative~\cite{horvitz99}
 
 co-adaptation \cite{mackay90}
 
+automation accuracy \cite{roy19}
+
+Crowdsourcing: tasks not doable by a computer
+
 \subsection{Technology incompleteness}
 
 Every time a new technology is out, people predict the end of older technology.